seems as if, at this point in the endless process of return of the Left nationalist institutions, it is prudent that the Supreme Court could make out what he has done: ban the 254 candidates Bildu and we'll see how many of the electoral groups. But that is the most prudent does not mean that as fair. Prudence and justice often go well together and the courts come. But that marriage is not automatic and sometimes have to choose. As it has done 61 of the Supreme room where nine judges have opted for caution and six for justice. Those six have a powerful argument: that the courts must be fair rather than prudent.
to a request from the PP to be outlawed the same coalition Bildu Minister of Justice responded that it is not possible because the Political Parties Act allows parties outlawed but coalitions. There is a brilliant argument but formally correct. So the State objected to the nominations, for possible contamination , Rather than the coalition itself for some ideological reason. However, by blocking the 254 nominations to the Supreme Court outlawed in fact is what the Minister said that can not be done right, ie the coalition. I only know the reasoning of the Supreme by the press but if it is true that bases the decision on which Bildu is controlled by ETA and Batasuna, it is clear that chooses through ideology rather than by the physical evidence of contamination in each case.
Perhaps this is already enough for the Constitutional Court protects Bildu. But there's more. It is possible that, despite everything, the decision is not wise. Prohibition is based as has been done, it affects all candidates Bildu. But in these, besides the "independent" candidates are those of Eusko Alkartasuna and Alternatiba, two legal parties, for the sake of the Supreme Court decision was left without local representation. For Alternatiba the question is almost symbolic because the party in 2009 to emerge as a division of EB-Berdeak, no own local representatives. But not with Eusko Alkartasuna, which has nine mayors and council members almost two hundred in the Basque Country, Provincial Councils and without junteros. And can there be elections in the Basque Country without the presence of EA? Will have to see what is in the PNV but it is clear that if the result is the exclusion of AD and Alternatiba the election, the decision could be both, unjust and unwise.
course also be argued that, when they agreed to include their candidate lists Bildu, both EA and Alternatiba already knew what was exposed and, if you claim not to know, be reminded that astute concept of illegality occurrence. That is, now must decide the Constitutional Court in a case tangled with two-day period. Judges, as the Supreme, have to make decisions with the speed of politicians. I understand that if the Constitution is a way to keep the ban Bildu but EA and Alternatiba allow the elections will attend amended the destruction and may even put on the disparadero to ETA to understand once you have to disarm. But if it fails we have a problem.
(The picture is a picture of www.larrabetzutik.org under Creative Commons license ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment