Bildu it plays today in the Constitutional Tribunal, a body that may or may not ultimately coalition in Spain to attend the next 22 elections. Palinuro and thought in a previous post, y. .. Outlaw that the Supreme Court's decision to disqualify Bildu the 254 candidates and groups of voters, might not be wise or fair. About all that more cries to heaven that can be left out of the elections Alternatiba Eusko Alkartasuna and application sharing only with other independent leftwing nationalist. That prohibition is to be in fact a ban of the coalition in general, which already warned the Minister of Justice could not be done by right, because the Political Parties Law does not. In addition to this, which means, in a sense, a fraud, it is implied that the judges have disqualified Bildu lists to check one to one that are contaminated, which is obviously false. The ban is a hypothetical ideological motivation, since it is absurd Alternatiba EA and displayed as well as supporters of ETA. Since the ban
is more than doubtful and, if you add the deprivation of a fundamental right to vote and stand as candidates in a legal party, the issue has very bad pint, with the possibility that the Strasbourg Court fails against Spain in a safe Bildu resource that undoubtedly prompted the cancellation of elections. An unflattering picture. The Supreme Court reasoned, as expected, the EA and Alternatiba already knew what they were exposed as made up the coalition. Maybe, but it is not clear that there is a reasonable proportionality between the hypothetical offense and the sanction of withholding the exercise of a fundamental right and, incidentally, left without representation a section of the Basque electorate.
The only possible solution would be constitutionally entitled to the exclusion of all applications, if necessary, to individual candidates to substantial evidence that they are contaminated . Those excluded could be replaced by alternates or may run the posts on the lists. From a legal point of view is fair and from a political one, is necessary. I do not know if it is called democratic elections in which no party can participate who wants to do it legal. It is unthinkable that the PNV to take a position clearly requires the presence of EA under the threat of withdrawing him also of electoral competition, but to do something like this requires people with more fiber than those burukides that only the strong have the microphones. Why not be surprising that these strategists short flight see an opportunity to recover all of the national vote and tempted to take advantage of a situation of injustice that affects their opponents and competitors.
Here the only beneficiary in this court pandemonium sets in a jam English democracy in the Basque Country is the PP and its scorched-earth strategy for this party always prefers the serenity situations to democracy.
(The picture is a picture of argazkiak.org under Creative Commons license ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment