all elections in Spain are generally not in terms of territory but in terms of issues discussed. Whether municipal, regional or at play, Europe, the talk is of national policy. No doubt the autonomic presidents or candidates, or candidates and mayors will discuss infrastructure, irrigation, cleaning, parks, schools. But, when they can be accompanied by a national leader, the spotlight is going to it / a, normally, enough has to know in which province is and talks about the government, well, if it belongs to him and wrong if not belong . It's an iron law.
If not for active is passive. The most newsworthy events, that make headlines, are citizens who have direct impact on subnational levels. For example, having Pedreira inhibited the judge, who instructed the Valencian branch of the Gürtel in favor of the High Court of Valencia (TSJPV), it has launched the formal procedure to impute several members of the PP dome in Valencia, some of which nine or ten, are candidates in the party lists. So now there is no clear sequence of events likely: if Camps will be president and then as a defendant appear in court or if they first appear before the judge and then was elected president Community. Whatever the order, the product will not be altered: if the Valencian Camps elect, elect a president that can disable TSJPV of public office for at least. It is a reasonable and at the same time, irrational. It is unlikely that the electorate decides that drink saved because, apparently, does not care Camps.
The other question, which is intended to cover the Gürtel , is the legalization of Bildu. Someone in good faith would think that since it has been pronounced by the Constitutional Court, there is more to say. But good faith is a bad pickle to think. Immediately, the PP has become a machine gun nonsense and atrocities of all kinds. The inevitable Mayor Oreja, whose love of fib is similar to the ruminant in green, and with the same calm, says that legalization of Bildu is a "bad news" and it is logical that it seems. But he also said responsible for the legalization government, which gives an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat this good man meant by separation of powers. It must be that in his time as minister of the ruling that the judges say they have to do was practice.
heard yesterday one of those journalists who practice professional intrusion which then complain, self-styled political analysts and they often do not know what they talk, stressing the special importance of the negative vote of Judge Reyes Aragón progressive because it was the only constitutional even though the Court Tremps Perez, who voted yes, so is. Another political analyst was under the front of the Supreme Constitutional because it is not a judicial body, not knowing that a court has jurisdiction and that the legislature has given, among other things review the decision of the Supreme when duly called for this and there is room. Obviously in both cases was what was to delegitimize the ruling by the Constitutional majority, as shown, having no idea. No importa, la cuestión es soltarla y cobrar. Por eso tienen estos debates el nivel que tienen.
A su vez, los políticos, que no están obligados, al parecer, a fundamentar lo que dicen, recurrieron al fuego graneado de barbaridades. Soraya Sáez de Santamaría duda de la lealtad constitucional de los magistrados del Constitucional que votan lo que a ella no le gusta. Y González Pons, cuyo afable rostro no prepara en absoluto para la ruindad de sus propósitos, atribuye el voto sí al hecho de que los magistrados se sientan seguros porque llevan escolta. Así de guapos quedan los jueces: son unos lacayos del gobierno, unos desleales y unos cobardes. Y este es el partido de la derecha, puntal de la ley y el orden. Where there
employer does not send a sailor, so tertiary control with Aguirre on the head, for whom it is obvious that if ETA / Bildu is in institutions is because the Socialists have wanted, equating in his corner so damned liberals six PSOE militants. Rajoy can not let him eat the ground Aguirre rhetorical form that explores the absurdity it clear that legalizing Bildu means that the Government has given ETA. Luckily no one believes this nonsense and if the release is because they think the people who despise the bottom, only understands the bold. And the thick, in turn, is to hide the Gürtel , Not talk about it, not knowing that a handful of charges of PP takes years decimating public funds. But it is inevitable: the Gürtel continue to grow, as the body of the work of Ionesco and you can not hide even if some strategist comes to mind right off the fire with a bang by saying, for example, who knows good ink meetings of the Council of Ministers chaired by Josu Ternera. That's called creative policy.
(The picture is a picture of CPAP under Creative Commons license ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment