I said, a daily anger until 22 May. The burden brigade against everything that shines. Police, judges, doctors, public broadcasting. It seems right that it does not calibrate the deplorable fact that these excesses have on people, the vast majority are moderate, that is, rejecting the excesses and, above all the abuse. This kind of moral lynching that the right wants to perpetrate on the journalist Ana Pastor has the worst press in the world because, apart from making it a champion of freedom of expression, makes the journalism profession close ranks in defense of one of his, which also has an excellent resume.
anyway but the charges tend to go to personal to be quite unpleasant, Shepherd must bear in mind that it is not. The PP would attack anyone take his place because the attack is institutional, public broadcasting. It is the very idea of \u200b\u200bobjectivity and impartiality of the media. Everything is not unqualified to serve their interests seems to PP unprofessional. Reviewing the video of the discussion taking in the program Breakfasts Ana Pastor can be detected in a bad grape Cospedal intemperance, a despondency to a professional who was doing his job impeccably telltale class attitude that quickly captures people. So it is so valuable temperate statement published by the journalist's blog (pictured), expressing what their phones and leaving clear the difference between a journalist who does quality work and a crew of fanatics who only seeks to build uproar every time a professional did not acquiesce to their intentions and distinguishes between the general interests and those of a party.
Basically, the problem is always the same: that there is talk of the Gürtel after the courts have taken another step closer to Camps to the bench to admit it can be processed with the heads of the plot to allegedly favored with a clear breach of the public interest. Those are things that people understand very well and they foreshadow a situation that anyone would be surprised: see Correa Camps processed. To avoid logical talk about this as well as any other factor that may disturb the placidity of the PP's electoral victory into question the public broadcaster (although never been better in a democracy, at least when compared with that mounted Aznar Razorfen times the unspeakable Urdaci), questions the professionalism of the police or judges, as required. And to walk with the King eye to that aspect of progress that is being cast that also may question the relevance of the Crown if it is unconditionally in the service of right.
0 comments:
Post a Comment