Saturday, May 22, 2010

6oth Anniversary Speeches

affect the end we always pay the piper the same. RTVE

public services are some years in the "eye of the hurricane." Officials who provide daily support to discredit the media derechona communication, which has finally achieved its goal of discrediting of public sector workers as evidenced by the latest polls, on the other side as all biased and targeted. Has Everybody knows that aims to make the right economic policy and the country with the public sector, privatize that no business. Every time it gets easier with Esperanza Aguirre and company justify their privatization policies. All this thanks to a government called "socialist."

What workers and unions can not allow is that changing our working conditions is by decree, without negotiation, without balance, without project. Where is the right to collective bargaining? What is this twist? The adjustment measures of the Government of Spain seem the tip of the iceberg. They will not solve the real problems of the economy and certainly hinder the exit of the crisis.

When the government proposed a plan of adjustment makes only labor income. Where is the effort of capital income?

wanted to reform the market and the market has restored to us, with the approval of political parties and institutions. The same people who got us into the crisis, attacked the euro. The same people who said they were subprime financial products solvents are now saying that the debt is worth less Greek or English. Are we crazy or what? Let's leave these corrupt us further belt tightening for them to get positive balances in their banks and companies. Let's leave their media to call us lazy, unsupportive and gain much when they are early retirement of 80 million euros for running a bank that no longer works, nor to give credit, where each executive's Ibex 35 wins a million per year on average. Above we have to endure that defame the unions saying that receive millions in subsidies (16M for all), always just when they move. Have if we have to explain that in this country all institutions and social workers receive grants based on their representation, including employers.

Should make adjustments? Yes, but all in a balanced manner and not by decree. We still hope the efforts of the great fortunes that are deposited in the SICAV and taxed at 1%. We still hope the efforts of big companies who claim benefits ultramillonarios. Even still hope for an end to corruption and tax evasion involving 90,000 million euros a year in this country. We will continue waiting.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

How To Make Pokemon Screen Bigger On Blackberry

: a

Three Acts, a term-frame and a proposition of law in the past four years, and still does not have RTVE defined business model. Now preparing the negotiation of the contract program without appearing to be greatly improved things.

The truth of the facts leads us to the lack of compliance with legislated. The task of public service is clear, as there can be no other way down to the detail, but lists a lot of goals today that remain unfulfilled. RTVE is anchored in a model of radio and television set automatically by the years, pursued over the tastes of the audience, based on entertainment, to get the best "share." It would be wrong to believe that by scheduling a contest as "Word for word, and little else, is hereby fulfilled the task of defending and promoting the Castilian national and international level, so we spend almost all the objectives set by law.

Indeed, we must make a radio and television for all, it is true that entertainment is a public service, but within the European audiovisual landscape is the only entertainment that is guaranteed by the private sector. RTVE has at its disposal 2 DTT multiplex, this implies the possibility of issuing 8-channel opens up endless possibilities to accommodate a wide range of audiovisual genres that could inform, educate and entertain, but also allow the right to attend and of access for different sectors of society for integration territorial cohesion and a demand for law.

Why this country has no educational television? Why English Television has no program dedicated to the environment, gender violence, media literacy, etc? It will not be for lack of means to produce or windows for issuance. I tend to think that managers of RTVE have not had the will or have failed to understand what they were required by law.

Much remains to be done and we still have time. Although it is always the excuse of no money and now less.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Watch Lacrosse Games Online

An unfinished model to get by Chimera

Unions NO promoted a preliminary agreement signed by the UGT and CCOO have developed RTVE finally its proposal. Two assemblies held in Madrid, with 300 workers, have served to develop a document that serves as a basis for negotiating with the management of the company.

Initially the proposal was interesting, but is marked targets that exceed a negotiation with the Department of RTVE. This is a document that seeks to amend the legislative body developed recently for publicly owned state television. A text that would amend the templates signed by all unions to form the current RTVE.

table also presents a production that takes over until the management contracts, but when he says he is equal binding and then says that the mandatory reports he sent to his knowledge, "can this improve reporting ... ". Clearly the statutory report for the Directorate does, and reports are only to be known and not mandatory. This has caused me some disappointment. Not to mention that does not say how this table works and does not provide any information rights.

I am also concerned that calling for the elimination of fees and then only from the change or ask to reduce the structure of outside directors to 10% and then in the calendar read "Dispense with any recruitment external. "

Then I saw a long list of "specific commitments" that most are a statement of intent and studies (for a widely criticized in the previous draft agreement), so if you have taken to involve the rest of RNE and they voted overwhelmingly CCTT the YES in the referendum.

Finally, we should all sit down and analyze the complex situation that has no single solution. We must stress the negotiation of the contract-program that should contain a strategic plan for RTVE. The company will have to accept that workers have a lot to say and much to correct them.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Why Are My San Pedro Seedlings Turning Red



unions Schizophrenia minority asked in the referendum but they expected an IS NOT. Wanted and promised their voters a YES. His surprise was great and the management of the strike, so they should, disastrous.

Consistency of major trade unions calling for the referendum but if came NO IF had to abide by an undesired result. This has been supported the strike and participated in it but not rule it results in a bad strike.

have erred, if anything, UGT and CCOO is to calculate the discontent and lack of trust that exists, especially in Prado del Rey and TVE Sant Cugat. National Radio, the Corporation and the Regional Centres in a more reflective voted overwhelmingly to favor of the draft agreement, perhaps because they are not subjected to the pressure they have been exercising more workers affected by outsourcing.

must be acknowledged that the strike in TVE-Prado del Rey has been much better than in other workplaces RTVE as co-working platform, mainly personal media drives, have worked well for achieve this, the remaining minority unions have gone back, some even tried to channel this work.

And now, where to go? We wake up every negotiation or we all. The desired unity as unworkable union, this strike is surely greater. He has left us all reflect, analyze and decide that we want to do to get this company move forward when I say everyone, including the direction of RTVE, the Governing Body and the Government of the country. Workers have had the word and say NO, we like it or not, the democratic exercise is as healthy in these times, but the exercise of this responsibility and it must also exercise the unions are in class or not, whether majority or no.